Sorta. Today, Jim Cramer gave a thumbs' up to Hawaiian Electric during the "Lightning Round" on Mad Money.
HECO reported a dismal Q2 recently, and as a resident of Oahu, I'm not surprised. How is any utility here supposed to grow when population growth is stagnant? On the other hand, HECO has a partnership with Hoku Scientific in regard to solar panels. So I wonder, which is the better long-term investment: HECO or HOKU?
My money is literally on HOKU. Just a bit of money. No question, Hoku could swing and miss. Hoku could also knock a series of pitches out of the park come 2009. HECO has limited growth prospects, though it is (finally) trying to venture into alternative energy with a real sense of commitment.
I'll put more cash into my A grade picks any time before HOKU or HECO, but the local angle is compelling for me.
Pupule Paul is slightly long HOKU.
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
Hawaiian energy showdown?
Labels:
Hawaiian Electric,
HECO,
HOKU,
Hoku Scientific,
Jim Cramer,
Lightning Round,
Mad Money
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment