I figured, well, if the fundamentals are squared up and low risk, the stock will be reliable. Maybe not a high flyer, but solid with a conservative foundation. I went over numbers for dozens of stocks and pegged the ones that had strong growth plus relatively low P/E plus accelerating EPS.
I categorized these stocks in a list I call Fundamentally Sound.
Then I took the stocks that had terrific growth, accelerating EPS, but high P/E numbers and listed them as Growth with Some Fun(damentals). All along, I expected the Fundamentally Sound portfolio to lag since the growth and risk were tempered. The opposite proved true, however, during the first two months I monitored the lists.
The only stock down among the 25 in Fundamentally Sound is Procter & Gamble (PG), down 2 percent. The P/E range is from 13 to 30, still fairly low but not as it was four months ago.
The only down stock was Starbucks (off by 8.8 percent).
I think a mix of both conservative growth and off-the-rails growth can be beneficial in a bull market. It's been intriguing to follow a lot of companies that wouldn't have held my interest 10 years ago. Seems like the older I've gotten, the more I appreciate an efficient, growing business, regardless of product.
My guess is that should there be a global market retreat, the Fundamentally Sound list will hold up better. Live by the high P/E, die by the high P/E.
In the next post, I'll take a look at some other faux portfolios, including stocks recommended at the start of the year by financial writers in national media.
No comments:
Post a Comment